Oracle EVP Steve Miranda
Oracle EVP Steve Miranda

How Oracle Won 100+ Cloud Deals from SAP: a Chat with Steve Miranda

53941 0

Nintex ad about process governance

Nintex ad 5

While Larry Ellison last week reveled in revealing a stunning list of Oracle apps wins versus archrival SAP, there hasn’t been much discussion of how and why those businesses decided to move some or all of their applications to Oracle Fusion.

(On my weekly Cloud Wars Top 10 rankings, Oracle is #6 and SAP is #5.)

The person who might know more about those motivations than anyone else is Oracle executive vice president of applications Steve Miranda, who’s led the development of Oracle’s Fusion SaaS apps since 2007 and has been with the company since 1992.

I had the chance to speak with Miranda recently about the much-publicized customer conversions that Ellison disclosed on Oracle’s March 10 earnings call. I was glad to have the chance to speak with Miranda not only due to his role as Oracle’s applications chief, but also because he’s exceedingly honest, rational and fact-driven.

Those attributes are always valuable but are particularly so in this case as the emotionally charged issue has wound up both companies pretty tight. And for good reason: the stakes in the enterprise apps business, particularly for cloud ERP, are enormously high and are rising daily as large and midsize companies surge into the cloud.

Before sharing Miranda’s insights, two related comments:

  • tomorrow, I’ll be giving SAP equal time with an article based on a conversation I had yesterday with an SAP executive; and
  • let me take a moment to offer some historical context about the incredibly strategic significance of this latest round in the SAP-versus-Oracle battles.
Battle background: SAP vs. Oracle

SAP, the unquestioned leader in enterprise applications, says it has 16,000 ERP customers, which covers both traditional on-premises installations (probably about 12,500 of those 16,000) and cloud-based S/4HANA Cloud deployments.

Ellison sees that enormous installed base of on-premises customers—including many or perhaps even most of the world’s largest corporations—as a phenomenal market opportunity for Oracle. That’s because Ellison believes his Fusion ERP cloud applications can present a much better value proposition to those 12,500 companies running old versions of SAP ERP than SAP can with S/4HANA Cloud.

It’s also important to bear in mind that both SAP and Oracle are huge companies with each claiming to have more than 400,000 customers. So it doesn’t strain the laws of probability to think that, from time to time, some business customers will move from one vendor to the other, and perhaps even back again.

What makes the current situation more compelling—and more lucrative for the winner—is the rush by hundreds of thousands of businesses into the cloud to help them transform their business models and operations for the digital economy.

And while Ellison certainly wove some personal-opinion commentary into his remarks about those 100+ customers cited on the March 10 earnings call, he also offered this jarring assessment from Gartner about cloud ERP vendors:

Gartner ranks Oracle Fusion ERP far in front. I mean, far away. You can’t find a Magic Quadrant where there’s a bigger gap between number one and number two. And so, Gartner ranks Oracle Fusion ERP far in front of all the other cloud ERP systems. But what’s surprising is SAP isn’t number two. SAP isn’t number three. SAP isn’t listed among the leaders. SAP is listed among the laggards. Gartner – if you read the text, Gartner points out and I quote, “SAP’s own reference customers scored SAP in the lower half of cloud ERP vendors.

Steve Miranda: “A chance to show what we can do”

Against that backdrop, here are some perspectives from the Oracle EVP who’s led the development of the Fusion applications for 14 years and who’s spoken with thousands of cloud customers in the past few years.

“For the better part of the 3 decades I’ve been at Oracle, there were no real big changes in the ERP space,” Miranda said.

“But in the past few years, that has changed dramatically, and I think the big reason behind that change is the speed of innovation the cloud offers. In the on-premises world, it could take several years—sometimes even 10—for companies to make the decision to move or upgrade, to select the vendor, to go through all the planning and then the implementation.

“But now, with the cloud, it happens every 90 days. That’s an enormous difference.”

On top of that, Miranda said, some SAP customers have said that SAP’s policies regarding mainstream maintenance for its on-premises ERP systems have played a part in their decisions to explore various options. Regarding those policies, SAP offered this comment: SAP decided to end mainstream maintenance for SAP Business Suite 7 in 2027, but customers may still receive support until 2030 and beyond. SAP S/4HANA will be supported until 2040 in both deployment options. Please see details here.

“And that’s given us a chance to show what we can do,” Miranda said. 

Miranda: “There’s a dramatic difference”

On top of that, there’s the relentless business disruption that’s occurred over the past year, plus decisions that have to be made as a result of M&A.

“The business disruption’s really been profound. Look at Oracle—I could argue that we’ve gone from being a software company to a services company in a very short period of time.”

Plus, SAP aside, some enterprise-applications providers such as Infor and Lawson have on-premises apps that are heading for end-of-support status, a state Miranda described as being “a burning platform.” In that overall context, more and more business leaders are willing to tackle the big challenge of considering a major ERP upgrade, and in most cases that means moving to the cloud.

At this point, I pushed on Miranda to explain why those 100+ customers were coming out of those vendor-evaluation processes with the decision to go with Oracle.

“We think that it’s not only the difference in the quality of the products but also the cost of the software and the cost of the implementation,” Miranda replied.

“There’s a dramatic difference in the SaaS implementation cost for cloud ERP with Oracle and with SAP.

“We also think we have an advantage in offering customers more-flexible deployment and consumption options. We often recommend a phased approach, letting the customers choose how they want to go forward in the way that’s best for their business, which allows them to de-risk the situation,” Miranda said.

Which customers are making the switch?

Also, Miranda said these wins have occurred somewhere within the last 2 years, with many having taken place recently. Let’s look at some of the customer examples from the lineup that Ellison disclosed on March 10 and that Miranda discussed with me in more detail. 

Miranda had the customers divided across 4 distinct types of replacements: 

  • HCM;  
  • Supply Chain Management and Enterprise Performance Management; 
  • M&A-related full replacements of ERP systems; and 
  • full end-to-end ERP replacements.
  1. HCM replacements.

The first list of customer wins was for replacements of SAP HCM applications, but a note at the bottom of the list also said, “Many of these companies replaced additional SAP systems (not only SAP HCM replacements).” This list included 77 names, among them AXA, Bharti Airtel, CSX, DHL, Ford Motor, Kroger, Marriott Hotel and Tata Group.

Miranda said Oracle displaced core SAP HCM applications in many cases, as well as some point solutions from SuccessFactors. In many cases, the customers bought Oracle Financials as well as HCM, he added, with Marriott selectiong a full suite of Oracle Fusion apps.

  1. Supply Chain Management and Enterprise Performance Management replacements.

Many of the customers on this second list were part of an Oracle program called “Surround” wherein customers were deploying a Fusion app working in close conjunction with an on-premises application. “This allowed the customers to really see the contrast between what a cloud application could do versus their traditional application,” Miranda said, a contrast that in many cases spurred the customer to upgrade the comparatively primitive on-premises app.

Among the 34 companies on this list, some of the Oracle wins involved only a division of the company, a distinction that Miranda carefully specified. A few that stood out:

  • Aegean Airlines replaced SAP Supply Chain and Procurement;
  • Dow switched to Oracle Fusion Cloud Supply Chain Management and Transportation Management to handle complex, global supply chain and $2 billion of freight, representing Oracle’s largest transportation-management deal ever; and
  • Honda, while still running SAP ERP, installed Oracle Fusion Cloud Supply Chain Management, Transportation Management, and Global Trade Management.
  1. M&A-related replacements of full SAP ERP systems.

This list contained 17 companies, including Western Digital, Consol Energy, and Wind Tre. 

  • Western Digital:  mergers involving Western Digital (running Oracle E-Business Suite), SanDisk (running SAP), and HGST (running SAP) created the need for a single ERP platform, and Western Digital chose Oracle Fusion ERP;
  • Consol Energy: after it was spun out from a parent that ran SAP, Consol chose Fusion ERP, HCM, Supply Chain Management, and Enterprise Performance Management; and 
  • Wind Tre: Two telecomm companies merged to form the largest mobile operator in Italy. One was running Oracle E-Business Suite, the other SAP, and the new entity deployed Fusion ERP, SCM, and EPM. 
  1. Full end-to-end core SAP replacements.

Miranda said this group, which included 18 companies, primarily involved replacements of SAP R/3, and tilted heavily toward financial applications within the Fusion ERP suite.

  • G4S: while the name might not be familiar to you, it’s the world’s largest security company by revenue, and third-largest by number of employees. SAP R/3 was replaced by Fusion ERP and HCM.
  • TTX: a manufacturer of rail cars and related services for North America, TTX replaced a heavily customized SAP environment with Fusion ERP, HCM, SCM, and EPM.
  • Tical Logistica: Providing logistics and distribution services across Central America, Tical Logistica had SAP ERP running with Oracle Fusion Cloud Logistics Transportation Management. It then replaced SAP with Fusion ERP and also added Sales plus Supply Chain Planning and Warehouse Management.

It’s clearly an impressive set of commercial victories for Oracle. But it’s also important to bear in mind that SAP remains firmly entrenched within many of the companies mentioned by Ellison on the March 10 call, and many of those named above as specified. 

And, as I said, tomorrow we’ll hear from an SAP executive about the current mindset of SAP customers and their excitement to jump aboard some of the many new innovations SAP is delivering.

So say it with me: in the Cloud Wars, the biggest winners are always the customers.

Disclosure: at the time of this writing, Oracle and SAP were among the many clients of Cloud Wars Media LLC and/or Evans Strategic Communications LLC.


Subscribe to the Cloud Wars Newsletter for in-depth analysis of the major cloud vendors from the perspective of business customers. It’s free, it’s exclusive and it’s great!